완산학원 이사장 말 바꾸기 정황 뚜렷…

The audit of Wansan Academy by the Jeonbuk Provincial Office of Education has concluded. However, the end of the audit does not mean that the core suspicions have been resolved. Key issues that remained unresolved until the last day of the audit, such as the credibility of the interim chairman's board statements and suspicions of false information in the court-submitted confirmation document, must still be addressed even after the audit results have been announced.

<b>Continued 'Changing of Statements' by the Wansan Academy Chairman</b>

The chairman's statement that the audit officials recommended specifying the intra-corporate transfer clause in the articles of association was initially refuted by the official denial of the Education Office, and later, the chairman significantly backtracked on this statement during the 5th interim board meeting on June 16, as confirmed through the meeting minutes.

The chairman had stated during the 3rd interim board meeting on April 1 that the audit officials had "suggested presenting the articles of association as an opinion," and in conversations with school staff, he even used the expression, "the audit officials recommended putting it in the articles of association." However, after the Education Office spokesperson officially clarified that there was no such recommendation, the chairman's statement in the 5th interim board meeting minutes was changed to:

"When we went to deliver a specific audit request in March and had a brief meeting with the audit officials, they said that since private schools do not usually have issues with the intra-corporate transfer clause, 'why not just specify it in the articles of association,' as we kept hearing this advice from various sources due to the uniqueness of our school, we said, 'can we just specify it in the articles of association,' and the audit officials responded, 'I guess that would be fine,' and we had a general discussion at a common-sense level..."

#1

<b>The narrative completely changed to a scenario where the audit officials agreed after the chairman's side spoke first, which was a complete reversal.</b>

However, the revised version contains expressions that undermine the chairman himself. He directly defined the meeting as a "general discussion at a common-sense level." It is an acknowledgment that the conversation was inappropriate to be used as official evidence. Nevertheless, the chairman introduced and recorded that statement as the basis for amending the articles of association during the April board meeting. Furthermore, even the fact that the audit officials agreed is solely based on the chairman's unilateral account. There is no objective record such as meeting notes, attendees, or official letters to support this.

<b>Internal source familiar with the audit officials: "It is unlikely that such a statement was made"</b>

An employee from another department of the Jeonbuk Provincial Office of Education who is familiar with the audit officials firmly stated to the newspaper, "Considering that person's character and principles, I do not believe there is a possibility that such a statement advising the chairman of the audited entity on the direction of amending the articles of association was made." The Education Office spokesperson stated that the audit officials, in fact, had a conversation that was more about "compliance with the Private School Act and the articles of association."

In conclusion, the flow of events in this matter can be summarized as follows:

April 3rd board meeting: "The audit officials first presented an opinion."

Conversation with school staff: "The audit officials recommended putting it in the articles of association."

Official clarification by the Education Office: "There was no such recommendation; it was more about compliance with the Private School Act and the articles of association."

June 5th board meeting minutes: "We said it, and the audit officials said it would be fine."

Education Office official: "There is no possibility that the audit officials made such a statement."

Despite repeatedly retracting his statements, the chairman has never provided verifiable evidence to support his claims.

<b>While the audit has ended, the suspicions have not</b>

The audit by the Jeonbuk Provincial Office of Education has concluded. However, if the audit results did not clearly address these key issues, the integrity of the audit itself remains in question.

Whether the statements made by the audit officials in the official board meeting minutes are accurate, if the confirmation document submitted to the court contains false information, and if the administrative director who raised objections was subjected to collective pressure, these three issues must be included in the audit report.

If the audit results have sidestepped these issues, the Jeonbuk Provincial Office of Education must publicly explain how these issues were handled along with the announcement of the results. The decisions of the Appeals Review Committee, evaluations of the school principal, official clarifications by the Education Office, and testimonies from internal sources all point in a direction contrary to the chairman's claims.

Now that the audit has concluded, the focus should be on the transparent disclosure of the Jeonbuk Provincial Office of Education's audit results and the responsible follow-up actions. The pursuit of truth does not end with the conclusion of the audit.

📝 Summary:
The audit of Wansan Academy by the Jeonbuk Provincial Office of Education has ended, but key suspicions remain unresolved. The chairman's statements regarding the audit have changed multiple times, raising doubts about the integrity of the process and the credibility of the information provided.

🗣️ Natural Korean Translation:
전북도교육청에 의한 완산학교 감사가 종료되었지만, 주요 의혹은 여전히 해결되지 않았습니다. 회장의 감사에 대한 발언이 여러 차례 변경되면서 프로세스의 무결성과 제공된 정보의 신뢰성에 대한 의문이 제기되고 있습니다.

❓ Comprehension Questions:
1. Did the audit of Wansan Academy by the Jeonbuk Provincial Office of Education resolve all key suspicions?
감사처리가 완산학교에 대한 전북도교육청의 의심을 완전히 해결했습니까?

2. What doubts have arisen regarding the chairman's statements during the audit process?
회장의 감사 과정 중 발언에 대해 어떤 의문이 제기되었습니까?

3. What actions must the Jeonbuk Provincial Office of Education take if the audit results did not address certain key issues?
감사 결과가 특정 주요 문제를 다루지 않았다면 전북도교육청은 어떤 조치를 취해야 합니까?

💡 Vocabulary Learning:
1. audit (감사, noun)
- A formal examination of financial accounts.
- 재무 계정의 공식적인 검토입니다.
- The company's financial statements were under audit by an external firm.
- 회사의 재무제표가 외부 기관에 의해 감사 중이었습니다.

2. credibility (신뢰성, noun)
- The quality of being trusted and believed in.
- 신뢰받고 믿음을 얻는 품질입니다.
- The witness's credibility was questioned during the trial.
- 증인의 신뢰성이 재판 중에 의문을 제기받았습니다.

3. suspicion (의심, noun)
- A feeling or belief that something is wrong or that someone is involved in a crime.
- 무언가 잘못된 것이거나 누군가 범죄에 연루되어 있다고 느끼는 감정 또는 믿음입니다.
- The police had suspicions about the suspect's alibi.
- 경찰은 용의자의 알리바이에 대해 의심을 품었습니다.

4. unilateral (일방적인, adjective)
- Involving only one group or country.
- 한 그룹 또는 국가만을 포함하는 것입니다.
- The decision was made unilaterally without consulting the other partners.
- 다른 파트너들과 협의하지 않고 일방적으로 결정이 내려졌습니다.

5. verifiable (확인 가능한, adjective)
- Able to be checked or proven to be true.
- 확인하거나 참된 것으로 증명할 수 있는 것입니다.
- The experiment results were not verifiable due to inconsistent data.
- 실험 결과가 일관성 없는 데이터로 인해 확인이 불가능했습니다.

닫기