Care workers had bruises on their faces. When a journalist, who had to attend a meeting for another matter, asked about the bruises on their faces, they cautiously explained the situation. They had been hit in the face during a sudden outburst of a child with intellectual disabilities they were caring for at a local child care center.
However, they did not make an issue of their own injury. They even personally bore the cost of hospital treatment. They were worried that demanding formal handling of the incident or compensation might cause harm to the child or their guardian. Even after hearing about the available compensation system, their reaction did not change significantly. They believed that it was more important for the child not to be harmed than for them to receive compensation for their medical expenses.
However, not long after, they encountered another scene. When a journalist visited a facility to set up a data storage server on a laptop for people with disabilities, they noticed several nail marks and treatment marks on the face of the facility manager. In this facility as well, the focus was on requesting an increase in staff from higher authorities rather than emphasizing compensation for the staff's injuries.
Although these two cases seemed coincidental, can they be simply dismissed as such? In the field of caring for individuals with disabilities, emotional and behavioral difficulties can lead to unpredictable behaviors. Pushing, scratching, or hitting behaviors may occur momentarily. At such times, it is crucial not to immediately label individuals with disabilities or children as 'perpetrators'. It is necessary to consider the background of the behavior, such as the characteristics of the disability, communication difficulties, anxiety, and excitement states.
However, on the other hand, there is another issue. There is a culture that accepts the injury of care workers as 'part of the job'. Even when they have bruises on their faces and nail marks to the extent that they need hospital treatment, the staff are more concerned about the harm to the service users than speaking up about their own injuries. In some cases, even the institution's responsible individuals stop at requesting an increase in staff rather than addressing their own injuries.
Such situations should not be viewed solely through the dedication and sense of mission of the staff. The rights of those receiving care and the safety of those providing care are not conflicting values.
Even if the staff do not directly hold the child or person with disabilities and their guardians accountable when they are injured, there are workers' compensation and various injury protection systems that can support their treatment and recovery. The problem lies in the existing anxiety that staff may not be fully aware of these systems on-site, and that following the compensation procedures may be perceived as shifting responsibility to the service users.
Ultimately, the staff end up bearing the cost of treatment with their own money, and the facility concludes the incident by appealing for a shortage of staff. However, this approach cannot be a fundamental solution.
If accidents continue to occur, it is necessary to examine whether the staffing and work environment, as well as support systems considering the behavioral characteristics of the service users, are appropriate. It is essential to check whether the number of service users that one staff member is responsible for is appropriate, whether additional staff can be deployed in cases of sudden behaviors, and whether there is a system in place to support staff with treatment and psychological recovery after an incident.
In particular, there is a need for improvement in the compensation system. If care workers have to worry about whether the money they claim for medical expenses will be later demanded from the child or guardian, even if the system exists, it may not function properly on-site.
It is necessary to clearly guide and expand a public compensation system that does not shift responsibility to service users or guardians, allowing staff to seek treatment without worry.
Hiding accidents is not a way to protect individuals with disabilities. Forcing individuals to endure bruised faces and scratched wounds is not good care either. To protect those receiving care, those providing care must also be safe.
The statement, "I did not claim medical expenses for fear of harming the child," should not remain as a myth of the care scene. Instead, creating a system where such statements are unnecessary is a task that our society must address.
📝 Summary:
Care workers at a child care center and a facility for people with disabilities suffered physical injuries from the individuals they were caring for. Despite their injuries, they chose not to seek compensation or formal handling of the incidents, prioritizing the well-being of the individuals they cared for. This highlights the challenges faced by care workers and the need for better support systems in place.
🗣️ Korean Translation:
보육원과 장애인 시설에서 일하는 보호자들이 보호 중인 아이들로부터 상처를 입었습니다. 그들은 상처를 받았음에도 불구하고 보호받는 사람들의 안녕을 우선시하며 보상을 요구하지 않았습니다. 이는 보호자들이 직면하는 어려움과 더 나은 지원 시스템의 필요성을 강조합니다.
❓ Comprehension Questions:
1. Why did the care workers choose not to seek compensation for their injuries?
상처를 입은 보호자들이 상처에 대한 보상을 요구하지 않은 이유는 무엇인가요?
2. What were the priorities of the care workers when it came to handling the incidents?
일어난 사건을 처리할 때 보호자들의 우선순위는 무엇이었나요?
3. What is the main issue highlighted in the article regarding the treatment of care workers' injuries?
보호자들의 상처 치료에 관한 주요 문제는 무엇인가요?
💡 Vocabulary Learning:
1. bruises (상처, noun)
- Injuries on the skin that appear as discolored patches.
- 피부 상에 변색된 패치로 나타나는 부상
- She had bruises on her arms from the fall.
- 그녀는 넘어지면서 팔에 상처를 입었습니다.
2. outburst (돌발 사태, noun)
- A sudden release of strong feelings or actions.
- 강한 감정이나 행동의 갑작스러운 발산
- The child had an outburst of anger when he didn't get his way.
- 아이는 자기가 원하는 대로 되지 않아서 화를 내었습니다.
3. compensation (보상, noun)
- Something, typically money, awarded to someone in recognition of loss, suffering, or injury.
- 손실, 고통 또는 부상을 인정받아 누군가에게 주어지는 것, 일반적으로 돈
- The company offered compensation for the damage caused by their mistake.
- 회사는 그들의 실수로 인한 손해에 대한 보상을 제공했습니다.
4. perpetrate (가하다, verb)
- To carry out or commit (a harmful, illegal, or immoral action).
- 해로운, 불법적 또는 부도덕한 행동을 실시하거나 저지르다
- The suspect was arrested for perpetrating the crime.
- 용의자가 범죄를 저질렀다는 이유로 체포되었습니다.
5. deployment (배치, noun)
- The movement or positioning of troops or equipment for military purposes.
- 군사 목적으로 군대나 장비의 이동 또는 배치
- The deployment of additional staff was necessary to handle the situation.
- 상황을 처리하기 위해 추가 직원을 배치하는 것이 필요했습니다.
💬 댓글 (0)
댓글을 작성하려면 로그인이 필요합니다.
로그인첫 댓글을 작성해보세요!