Controversy surrounding the construction of the new airport in SaeManGeum is spreading once again. On the 14th, the SaeManGeum New Airport Blank Space Action Group and the National Lawsuit Group for the Cancellation of the SaeManGeum New Airport Basic Plan held a press conference, arguing that the basic plan should be canceled as it is difficult for the new airport to operate as the originally proposed "independent private international airport" by the government and Jeollabuk-do.
Kim Ji-eun, the co-executive director who explained on that day, pointed out that a key issue is that the runways of the SaeManGeum New Airport and Gunsan Airport are approximately 1.35 km apart, causing a significant overlap in control areas.
The Action Group stated, "Approximately 90.8% of the control areas of the SaeManGeum New Airport and Gunsan Airport overlap," and argued, "In order to function as an independent airport, it should have its own control area and authority, but at the current location, integrated control is inevitable." They explained that the basic plan of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport also includes the installation and operation of integrated control facilities due to the significant overlap of the control areas of the two airports.
The group pointed out that this structure conflicts with the original justification for the construction of the SaeManGeum New Airport. While the main argument for promoting the SaeManGeum New Airport was the need for a separate independent private international airport due to restrictions on international flights at Gunsan Airport, if the new airport also shares control systems with Gunsan Airport, the same problem could arise.
In particular, they claimed that in the 2017 aviation demand survey report and others, the current site of the SaeManGeum New Airport is described as within the control jurisdiction of Gunsan Airport and requiring consultation with the US military. They also revealed that the report includes the concept that the SaeManGeum New Airport is essentially an "extension of Gunsan Airport."
They also criticized the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport for stating in the appellate court during the ongoing lawsuit to cancel the basic plan of the SaeManGeum New Airport that the new airport is an "expansion of Gunsan Airport." They argued that in the past, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport and Jeollabuk-do had denied the claim that the SaeManGeum New Airport was an extension of Gunsan Airport, but in the lawsuit process, they are now emphasizing the logic of expanding Gunsan Airport.
Legal issues were also raised. The Action Group argued that based on the Airport Facilities Act and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport's Control Area Management Regulations, the flight procedures and control areas of adjacent airports should not overlap, and the overlap of control areas between the SaeManGeum New Airport and Gunsan Airport violates related regulations.
They claimed, "The SaeManGeum New Airport is only about 1.35 km away from Gunsan Airport, with control areas overlapping by more than 90%," and argued, "There was insufficient consideration of this issue during the establishment of the basic plan and the process of strategic environmental impact assessment."
Economic issues were also brought up again. The Action Group raised doubts about the claim that the SaeManGeum New Airport is a core infrastructure for regional economic revitalization, as the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport's 2019 feasibility study presented a cost-benefit ratio (B/C) at the level of 0.37. They argued that the potential for the SaeManGeum New Airport to grow into an international logistics hub or a global business center has not been sufficiently proven when considering aviation demand and logistics conditions. They suggested that the logic that airport construction directly leads to investment attraction and regional economic revitalization should be reconsidered, given that the proportion of air cargo in domestic import and export logistics is very low and air cargo is concentrated at airports like Incheon.
Environmental damage and the possibility of military use were also raised as issues. The Action Group argued that the planned site of the SaeManGeum New Airport and the surrounding tidal flats are habitats for various birds and wildlife, and irreversible ecosystem damage could occur with airport construction. They also expressed concerns about the potential future military use of the SaeManGeum New Airport based on its location adjacent to the Gunsan US military base and the integrated control structure.
The Action Group stated, "The SaeManGeum New Airport cannot operate as an independent private international airport, and the business purpose of revitalizing Jeollabuk-do's economy is also lacking in feasibility," and emphasized, "Constructing an airport that has not been sufficiently proven necessary, while investing a huge amount of money and causing ecological damage, should not be done."
They further stated that they have applied for the resumption of arguments in the lawsuit to cancel the basic plan of the SaeManGeum New Airport at the Seoul High Court, urging the court to re-examine the legality of the basic plan by reviewing the newly raised issues of control jurisdiction, control areas, and the purpose of the project.
The issues raised by the Action Group on control area overlap, violation of related laws, the nature of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport's legal representative's statements in court, etc., are expected to be clarified through the counterarguments of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport and the court's judgment in the future trial process.
📝 Brief Summary:
There is controversy surrounding the construction of a new airport in SaeManGeum due to concerns about overlapping control areas with an existing airport, economic feasibility, environmental damage, and potential military use. A group is arguing that the basic plan for the new airport should be canceled.
🗣️ Natural Korean Translation:
새만금에 새 공항 건설과 관련된 논란이 다시 확산되고 있습니다. 새만금 신공항 공백공간대책모임과 새만금 신공항 기본계획 취소 국민소송대책모임이 기본계획을 취소해야 한다고 주장하며 기자회견을 열었습니다.
❓ Comprehension Questions:
1. What are some of the main concerns raised by the Action Group regarding the construction of the new airport in SaeManGeum?
새만금 신공항 건설에 대한 주요 우려사항은 무엇입니까?
2. Why does the Action Group argue that the new airport should have its own control area and authority?
새 신공항이 자체적인 통제 영역과 권한을 가져야 한다고 주장하는 이유는 무엇인가요?
3. What doubts were raised by the Action Group regarding the economic feasibility of the new airport in SaeManGeum?
새만금 신공항의 경제적 타당성에 대한 의문점은 무엇이었나요?
💡 Vocabulary Learning:
1. Controversy, 논란 (Noun)
- A lot of people are involved in the controversy over the new airport construction.
- 새 공항 건설에 대한 논란에 많은 사람들이 관여하고 있습니다.
2. Overlap, 중첩 (Noun)
- There is a significant overlap in the control areas of the two airports.
- 두 공항의 통제 영역에 중요한 중첩이 있습니다.
3. Jurisdiction, 관할권 (Noun)
- The current site of the new airport is within the control jurisdiction of Gunsan Airport.
- 새 공항의 현재 위치는 군산 공항의 관할권 내에 있습니다.
4. Feasibility, 타당성 (Noun)
- The feasibility of the new airport as an international logistics hub is being questioned.
- 새 신공항이 국제 물류 허브로서의 타당성이 의문을 제기하고 있습니다.
5. Ecological, 생태학적인 (Adjective)
- There are concerns about irreversible ecosystem damage due to airport construction.
- 공항 건설로 인한 돌이킬 수 없는 생태계 피해에 대한 우려가 있습니다.
💬 댓글 (0)
댓글을 작성하려면 로그인이 필요합니다.
로그인첫 댓글을 작성해보세요!